Andreas Seppi (ITA) d. (q)Bobby Reynolds (USA) 6-1 6-7(4) 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-3
Same goes for Nadal vs Kohlschreiber in the 2R of the Australian Open.Elikian wrote:Just a simple thingy in the New Caledonia challenger, first round, second match:
Alex Kuznetsov (USA) vs Wayne Odesnik (USA) 6-7(4) 6-1 7-6(0)
because it is listed as vs my program says the match isnt completed yet.. could you please change it to d. ... I know it's stupid (I just suck at programming :p)

Thanks for fixing the other 2. You missed this one thoughElikian wrote:Missing Result from Australian Open R1 (yes, that was the match that ended at 3am in the morning then)
Andreas Seppi (ITA) d. (q)Bobby Reynolds (USA) 6-1 6-7(4) 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-3




It was 315 (Baker). Here are the final (updated) entry lists:Pete wrote:Steve
seems that Australian Open qualifying cut-off should be - Sebastien De Chaunac - 313 PR.


greatkingrat wrote:Pete wrote:Steve
La Serena ch. should have been 37,5K+H (and not 50K) as winner Zabaleta got 55 pts.
50K is correct. The ATP have changed the ranking points. 50K and 35K+H tournaments now get 55pts for the winner. 25K+H are still 50pts and will be scrapped at the end of the year.





http://stevegtennis.com/results/2007/a-delraybeach.txtPete wrote:and according to my observations
Delray Beach ATP - cut-off should be : 97 - Schuttler (and not 100-Schuttler) , as his ranking 6 weeks before start of the tournament was 97.
(maybe I´m wrong in this (maybe ATP changed the rule - if yes, someone write it)

Is result of that tournament part of best 18 results ? If yes, then
.
EddieV wrote:I don't know if someone already told it to you - I can't open the last page of this topic, it doesn't run, the same for the Guga topic in Pro Tennis, but I can open another pages with lots of posts, including the previous pages of these corrections topic. Is that a matter of the forum or of my PC?
Well, I think I might can't read your answer
Hmm, not sure. Its working for me. This post was awhile ago...still having the same problem? And no, I hadn't noticed that mistake. I will correct it finally.

EddieV wrote:yes, Steve, I'm still having the problem, not every time, but often, and in different PC's the problem happens. It happens in the topics with large number of replies.
thanks in advance!

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest