Forums

by **Pete** » Tue Sep 07, 2004 8:15 am

Steve

what was correct surface in Ecuador F1 - Hard (calendar) or Clay (results)
and Mexico F10 - Clay (calendar) or Hard (results)? - both played last week.

by **Steve G** » Tue Sep 07, 2004 10:43 am

Ok, done.

by **Shhh** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 12:51 pm

A real silly one this, I have just looked back to the points scored in the British satellite in February and, in the doubles, all British points winners are listed as Australian.

Made me smile anyway :lol:

by **Steve G** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 10:39 am

You can tell I borrow another file as a template and then type over. But sometimes I forget parts.

Thanks for pointing it out. I have corrected it.

[I have also decided to split this topic since it was getting long - I am mad with admin powers :twisted:

]

by **Pete** » Wed Sep 22, 2004 2:07 am

Steve

correct Szczecin challenger cut off is 166 (Tenconi) , not 186 typed by you.

by **Pete** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 10:42 am

Steve

just 2 remarks

in Davis Cup Romania vs. Canada in last match Ionita replaced Hanescu and has beaten Larose.

In Slovakia vs. Germany DC it was Kucera who has beaten Mayer in deciding 5th match (not Beck typed by you).

by **Steve G** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 12:12 pm

Perhaps I wasn't looking past first names.

Thanks, its corrected.

by **Pete** » Tue Sep 28, 2004 6:35 am

Steve

you mixed up correct order of Romania vs. Canada matches

right it is (according to daviscup.com) :

1st match Andrei PAVEL (ROM)d. Simon LAROSE (CAN) 75 63 62

2nd match Victor HANESCU (ROM) d. Frank DANCEVIC (CAN) 57 63 36 63 64

3rd match Daniel NESTOR / Frederic NIEMEYER (CAN) d. Victor IONITA / Florin MERGEA (ROM) 64 64 26 62

4th match Andrei PAVEL (ROM) d. Frank DANCEVIC (CAN) 62 64 62

5th match Victor IONITA (ROM) d. Simon LAROSE (CAN) 42 ret. Larose

by **Pete** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 7:58 am

Steve

Hanescu played 2nd match of 1st day and has beaten Dancevic (not Ionita). Hope its clear now :roll:

I have noticed also other differencies in futures money levels (this week tournaments)

in Great Britain F5 - calendar says 15K, while results only 10K
is Bolivia F2 providing hospitality ? ( calendar 15K+H, results 15K )

What level provided leg 1 of Portugal satellite? 10K?...or 25K?

...and 2 stupid errors

in Germany F14 (August 30-September 5, 2004) quarterfinals Jan Weinzierl beat ... himself. Actually he beat Stadler.

in Ecuador F1 (August 30-September 5, 2004) 2nd round Giraldo was multiple loser- he lost twice by your results - with Aranguren and Nunez. Actually he lost only to Aranguren. Nunez beat Pablo Gonzalez.

by **skipper** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 9:26 am

steve - name typo for shanghai doubles results for ashley fisher/tripp phillips (not phillipe). you had it right before results posting.

by **Steve G** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 1:13 pm

Thanks Pete and Skipper. All is correct now.

by **Pete** » Tue Oct 05, 2004 6:24 am

Steve

just 2 remarks

Tokio Open this week has 48 draw (not only 32 typed by you)

Who were US Open Zeropointers ?

by **Pete** » Fri Oct 08, 2004 6:32 am

Steve

who won Leg1 of Italy3 satellite last week - Giorgini or Op Der Heijde ?

What is correct prize money level in Hungary F6 playing this week - 10K (calendar) or 15K (results section) ?

by **Pete** » Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:17 am

Steve

What is correct prize money level in Hungary F6 played last week - 10K (calendar) or 15K (results section) ?

Who were US Open zeropointers?
(Schalken, Calleri, ... ? ? ? ...

by **PatatRiek** » Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:50 am

this week : Bolton challenger qualifying

(3)Melle van Gemerden (DEN) vs .....

Melle van Gemerden is from The Netherlands, so DEN should be NED

regards
PatatRiek

by **Steve G** » Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:23 am

What is correct prize money level in Hungary F6 played last week - 10K (calendar) or 15K (results section) ?

Sorry, $10K. I have corrected.

Who were US Open zeropointers?

Ugh, I keep forgetting about this one. Will have it soon.

Melle van Gemerden is from The Netherlands, so DEN should be NED

Sorry, a case of dyslexia.

by **Pete** » Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:00 am

Well Steve

another one

what is correct prize money level in Burbank ch this week. Your calendar says 50K while results 25K+H .

Prize money level in Australia satellite - Leg 4 (Masters) must have been the same as for first 3 legs - 25K+H (you have it without +H).

thanks for adding zeropointers.

by **Steve G** » Wed Oct 20, 2004 11:59 am

Thanks Pete. Yes, the Burbank challenger changed its prize money to $25K+H. Just forgot to change in the calendar.

I meant to check and see if all the AUS files were the same but hadn't gotten around to it yet.

Everything is now fixed.

by **Pete** » Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:06 am

... and another...

Barcelona ch last week has been played from October 11 to 17 (not 4th to 10th Oct. typed in your results section).

Would you correct it ?

by **Pete** » Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:24 am

sorry Steve

I didnot want to send it 3 times but some error occured in my computer ...

by **Steve G** » Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:21 am

Thanks, its corrected.

And I cleared up the multiple posts. 8)

by **Pete** » Wed Oct 27, 2004 7:50 am

Well Steve

another one...

What is correct prize money level in Chile F2 this week - 15K (calendar) or 10K (your results section) ?

by **Steve G** » Wed Oct 27, 2004 9:17 am

Its 10

by **Pete** » Thu Oct 28, 2004 8:01 am

... and what is correct surface in Brazil F11 this week ? - Clay (calendar) or Hard (results) ?

You could also write in Basel to results section that LL Ulihrach replaces Federer (it is in seeds section but not results)

by **Steve G** » Thu Oct 28, 2004 10:19 am

Brazil F11 is on Hard, calendar corrected. I have also added the LL info.

by **Andrew_Derer** » Sun Oct 31, 2004 10:53 pm

In Aachen you have

(3)Jeff Kerr/Jim Thomas (AUS/USA) vs Johan Landsberg/Thomas Shimada (SWE/JPN)

Its Jordan Kerr

by **cogliati** » Mon Nov 01, 2004 3:37 am

In Paris-Bercy draw

Nalbandian [8] is missing in the draw between Henman and Soderling vs Dent.
(any special reason for this??)

thanks

lorenzo

by **Steve G** » Mon Nov 01, 2004 9:45 am

Nope, just an ommision. :oops:

I corrected it last night but obviously never uploaded. Its fixed now.

by **Pete** » Fri Nov 05, 2004 8:54 am

Steve

In Paris doubles Hrbaty is partnering with Jiri Novak (not David Novak typed by you).

Has level of Ecuador satellite - Leg2 suddenly changed from 25 to 52K? :HeadBang:

There must be 25K in results section, of course.

If Spain F30 is playing Indoor then it should be written also in results section.

by **Steve G** » Fri Nov 05, 2004 10:29 am

All fixed.

by **Pete** » Fri Nov 19, 2004 11:16 am

Hi again Steve

this time 3 notes:

What is correct level in Champaign ch this week - 25K+H (calendar) or 50K (results section) ?

What is correct surface in Iran F3 this week - Hard (calendar) or Clay (results) (also there plays Algerian player Ouahab- not Ouahabi typed by you) ?

What is correct surface in Australia F3 this week - Grass (calendar) or Hard (results) ?

by **Steve G** » Fri Nov 19, 2004 3:25 pm

What is correct level in Champaign ch this week - 25K+H (calendar) or 50K (results section) ?

50k

What is correct surface in Iran F3 this week - Hard (calendar) or Clay (results) (also there plays Algerian player Ouahab- not Ouahabi typed by you) ?

This week and next are both clay. I have changed the calendar. Already corrected Ouahab.

What is correct surface in Australia F3 this week - Grass (calendar) or Hard (results) ?

Grass

by **westaussie** » Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:20 pm

Steve

at Aussie F3 Futures event last week you have that raphael durek played with matias guccione in doubles that should be chris guccione

Thanks

Rick

by **Steve G** » Sun Nov 21, 2004 10:12 pm

Silly mistake. Thanks.

by **Pete** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 9:12 am

Well Steve

another 2 remarks

What is correct surface in Australia F 4 this week – Grass (calendar) or Hard (results ?

You forgot to type that this year´s US Open cut:106 was Elsner.

by **Steve G** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:31 pm

Thanks. Fixed.

by **Pete** » Thu Nov 25, 2004 9:08 am

... and what is correct surface in Prague ch this week -
Carpet (calendar) or Hard (results) ?

by **PatatRiek** » Fri Nov 26, 2004 4:46 am

the link on the mainpage to Mauritius challenger website, goes to the Luxembourg challenger website 8-[

msg
PatatRiek

by **Steve G** » Fri Nov 26, 2004 6:58 pm

the link on the mainpage to Mauritius challenger website, goes to the Luxembourg challenger website

thanks, never set it properly :oops:

... and what is correct surface in Prague ch this week -
Carpet (calendar) or Hard (results) ?

All calendars and info say carpet. Drawsheet says "greenset". I though that was hard courts. Is there greenset carpet and greenset hardcourts??

by **pipoun** » Mon Nov 29, 2004 9:28 am

Hi,

I found that you give Vincent Baudat the MTQ nationality (for Martinique)
instead of French (Martinique is part of France)
This mistake appears in all rankings!

by **Steve G** » Mon Nov 29, 2004 1:25 pm

I am clinging hard to the Martinique listing.

by **Karol Beck** » Tue Nov 30, 2004 2:14 am

In the Reunion Island Challenger of the previous week there is the hungarian player Kornel Berdoczky, I think you mean Kornel Bardoczky

by **Karol Beck** » Tue Nov 30, 2004 2:29 am

French Team Championship

Day 4 - November 20

TC Melun d. Stade Toulousain 5-3
Davide Sanuinetti d. Nicolas Devilder 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4

Sanguinetti for Sanuinetti

by **Karol Beck** » Wed Dec 01, 2004 2:15 am

IRAN F4
CERMAK IN THE SECOND ROUND DEFEATED FRANISCO MALFITANI AND NOT FILIP URBAN, WHO REACHED THE SEMIFINAL

by **Steve G** » Wed Dec 01, 2004 10:22 am

Thanks. Another case of selecting the wrong line. 8-[

by **Pete** » Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:26 am

Steve

this is not your mistake:

Are doubles entry rankings correct ? I have noticed that Top 10 hasn´t changed since November 8 despite Masters Cup has played.
Seems that ATP forgot to add points for this year´s Masters Cup and remove points from last year.

Shouldn´t be doubles entry rankings counted as number of race best 18 points multiplied by 5 ? If so then ATP made a mistake.

Example :
Knowles and Nestor had both 961 race points on November 22.
But only 4630 entry points on Nov. 22, which is not correct because
961x5= 4805.

by **Steve G** » Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:29 pm

Nope. The Masters Cup does NOT count in the doubles entry rankings. It never has. So they are being consistent on this one.

by **Shhh** » Mon Dec 06, 2004 2:33 pm

A typo on your part I think Steve. You've listed Boggie as AUT and not GBR for the Austrian Challenger.

by **Pete** » Tue Dec 07, 2004 3:46 am

Well Steve

I don´t care much for doubles but isn´t it a little strange that players don´t get points for Masters cup ? Why do they play it then ? Just for fun and money?

Ok, but I think I´m right in this:
Are you sure that cut off for Ischgl challenger is Jan Hajek (309) ?
I think that it should be Lorenzi who was 309th 3 weeks before start of the tournament (on Nov. 15). Hajek was 656th on that date.
Or is Hajek´s protected ranking which he uses now 309th ?.
By the way where could I find protected rankings of players on the web ?

by **Pete** » Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:18 am

Today I found youngest ATP tournament finalist ever:

I found on ATP website that Jairo Velasco Jr. who was born on 21st January 1974 reached ATP doubles final in Calgary as 2 months old (maybe he sat on the court beside his father(?) Jairo Sr.).

And he was probably the biggest talent ever because when he was 5 he reached his 1st ATP singles final in Bogota 1979 also by ATP website.

Of course that both results should belong to Jairo Sr. , but it makes me laugh when I imagine that 2 months old child plays tennis.

Forums

Corrections

GB Satellite

szczecin ch cut

davis cup

correct order

Wrong country

Bardoczky

Sanguinetti

doubles entry rankings

Not a mistake

Bogdanovic

joke - the youngest ATP finalist ever

Who is online